Puppet and Ruby 2.0

[Michael Stahnke]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to at least keep logic for EPEL 6 (and higher eventually).
>> Puppet 2.6 which is in EPEL currently goes dead upstream at the end of
>> April, so we'll have to do something there.  I'm still weighing
>> options for EPEL in general.
>
> (adding epel-devel-list to the CC)
>
> If it's the case that Puppet 2.6 goes EOL in April, my vote would be
> to get Puppet 2.7 (or newer) into epel-testing sooner than later, so
> users have plenty of lead time to test this out.

After the current security release of 2.6.18[1] is pushed to stable,
I'll start working on the path forward for EPEL and leave it in
testing for a bit.


[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-0664/puppet-2.6.18-1.el5
[2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-0657/puppet-2.6.18-1.el6


>
> - Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel-list mailing list
> epel-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list