[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[et-mgmt-tools] Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger vyatta com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr ioremap net>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert gondor apana org au>, et-mgmt-tools redhat com, netdev vger kernel org, Eric Dumazet <dada1 cosmosbay com>, davem davemloft net
Subject: [et-mgmt-tools] Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:52:24 -0800

My working hypothesis is:
  1. Something about Evgeniy's patch makes IPV6 (actually IPV4 in IPV6) be
     preferred over plain IPV4.
  2. Vino server (VNC) doesn't think ::ffff::127.0.0.1 is really the localhost
  3. protocol gets screwed up after that.

It is probably reproducible with other services that support IPV6.

References:
- [et-mgmt-tools] Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.
  - From: Stephen Hemminger

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]