[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Ext3 vs. Reiser?
- From: XosÉ Vázquez <xose wanadoo es>
- To: Craig Tierney <ctierney hpti com>
- Cc: Martin Eriksson <nitrax giron wox org>, ext3-users redhat com
- Subject: Re: Ext3 vs. Reiser?
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:09:33 +0100
Craig Tierney wrote:
>
> I am using ext3 on my production systems. My interests lie more in
> large file performance that small file performance. In this situation
> Reiser did not perform well. I was seeing 20-30 MB/s for a ResierFs system,
> but ext3 was giving me 70 MB/s for reads and 100 MB/s for writes.
>
> All reports I have read say that Reiser is very good at small files. You see
> this during your kernel makes.
try to look this:
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.0/1241.html
regards,
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]