Re: Ext3 vs. Reiser?

[Qing Liu <qliu club-internet fr>]

Craig Tierney wrote:
> 
> I am using ext3 on my production systems.  My interests lie more in
> large file performance that small file performance.  In this situation
> Reiser did not perform well.  I was seeing 20-30 MB/s for a ResierFs system,
> but ext3 was giving me 70 MB/s for reads and 100 MB/s for writes.
> 
> All reports I have read say that Reiser is very good at small files.  You see
> this during your kernel makes.


Hi, 

You can find benchs reiserfs vs. ext3 on 
http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks/benchmark-results.html
I did also similar benchs:
http://www.linux-france.org/article/sys/ext3fs/Benchmarks/benchmark-mongo-2.txt
and
http://www.linux-france.org/article/sys/ext3fs/Benchmarks/index.html
(this one is in French)

Best regards,

Liu