[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: XFS vs. ext3
- From: "John Stoffel" <stoffel lucent com>
- To: Andreas Dilger <adilger clusterfs com>
- Cc: John Stoffel <stoffel lucent com>, Andrew Klaassen <ak dkp com>,ext3-users redhat com
- Subject: Re: XFS vs. ext3
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:27:38 -0500
Andreas> John, you are coming into the discussion late, and most of
Andreas> these things have already been covered. The application
Andreas> works fine when the Linux server is running XFS under Samba,
Andreas> and not when it's running ext3. So clearly the error is on
Andreas> the Linux side somewhere.
I'm not really sure about this, and what I was trying to get across
that having a better grasp of all the details would be a big help.
Sure, it looks like it might be an ext3/samba interaction, or even
just a pure ext3 problem, but having a client write as many 45mb files
via samba shouldn't be a problem at all. And I really wonder what
error(s) the application is glossing over, since I suspect that's not
helping the search for a solution.
That's why I suggested doing a test where Andrew tried using the
Windows NT explorer tools to copy a bunch of images from his Shake
servers to the Samba/ext3 server to see what happens. If that works
just fine, then the problem just got murkier.
John
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]