[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3

From: David Weinehall <david southpole se>
To: Andrew Ho <andrewho animezone org>
Cc: Dax Kelson <dax gurulabs com>, Peter Nelson <pnelson andrew cmu edu>, Hans Reiser <reiser namesys com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel vger kernel org>, ext2-devel lists sourceforge net, ext3-users redhat com, jfs-discussion www-124 southbury usf ibm com, reiserfs-list namesys com, linux-xfs oss sgi com
Subject: Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 02:41:15 +0100

On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote:
> XFS is the best filesystem.

Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of
ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS.

And people say size doesn't matter.


Regards: David Weinehall
-- 
 /) David Weinehall <tao acc umu se> /) Northern lights wander      (\
//  Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel   //  Dance across the winter sky //
\)  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    (/   Full colour fire           (/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
  - From: Robin Rosenberg

References:
- Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
  - From: Andrew Ho

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]