[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: mount r/w and r/o
- From: "Jeff Dinisco" <jeff jettis com>
- To: "Wolber, Richard C" <richard c wolber boeing com>, "Damian Menscher" <menscher uiuc edu>
- Cc: ext3-users redhat com
- Subject: RE: mount r/w and r/o
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:58:24 -0800
Performance is the answer. This is streaming media and the throughput
is very high.
-----Original Message-----
From: Wolber, Richard C [mailto:richard c wolber boeing com]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 5:01 PM
To: Damian Menscher; Jeff Dinisco
Cc: ext3-users redhat com
Subject: RE: mount r/w and r/o
> > My questions are...
> > Should I be concerned by this?
> > Is there a way to automatically skip the recovery attempt, and if
so,
> > should I use it?
> > Am I going about this all wrong, is there a better way to do this
> > (other than GFS)?
>
> Sorry to ask the obvious question, but why not just use NFS?
Performance? NFS is a lot of overhead to consider using on something
like
FC. Mounting r/o seems (and I await the experts opinion) at first glance
to be a very effictive way of doing this.
..Chuck..
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]