[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: EXT2 vs. EXT3: mount w/sync or fdatasync
- From: Andreas Dilger <adilger clusterfs com>
- To: brian stone <skye0507 yahoo com>
- Cc: ext3-users redhat com
- Subject: Re: EXT2 vs. EXT3: mount w/sync or fdatasync
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:25:02 -0600
On Mar 24, 2007 08:19 -0700, brian stone wrote:
> File system configuration:
> - 100G ext3 file system
> - Used a 32M journal on a physically separate device
We normally run our servers with at least 256MB journals - under metadata
intensive loads (including truncates) this can really help.
> - used "ordered" mode for the journal
> - mounted with "noatime,nodiratime,noauto,noacl,nouser_xattr,dirsync"
> - used the mkfs.ext3 -E option to set stripes to 16
> - RAID0 was using 64K stripes.
> - fs was using 4K blocks
> - each file transaction did: open(),write(),fsync(),close()
> - slammed 1024 1MB chucks at it
>
> I got 36 MB/Sec consistently. A good sign because with the proper hardware, this would perform really well.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]