[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Ext3 behavior on power failure
- From: armangau_philippe emc com
- To: <jakj j-a-k-j com>, <jack suse cz>
- Cc: linux-ext4 vger kernel org, ric echidna lss emc com, ext3-users redhat com, csar stanford edu
- Subject: RE: Ext3 behavior on power failure
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:17:33 -0400
In my case the disk cache is not a problem - We use an emc disk array
the write cache is protected -
Once the data has made over the disk array we can assume it is safe -
Thx
Philippe
-----Original Message-----
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. [mailto:jakj j-a-k-j com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 9:17 AM
To: Jan Kara
Cc: wheeler, richard; armangau, philippe; ext3-users redhat com;
linux-ext4 vger kernel org; csar stanford edu
Subject: Re: Ext3 behavior on power failure
> If you fsync() your data, you are guaranteed that also your data are
> safely on disk when fsync returns. So what is the question here?
Pardon a newbie's intrusion, but I do know this isn't true. There is a
window of possible loss because of the multitude of layers of caching,
especially within the drive itself. Unless there is a
super_duper_fsync()
that is able to actually poll the hardware and get a confirmation that
the
internal buffers are purged?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]