[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: fs periodic check (was Re: 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted)
- From: Theodore Tso <tytso mit edu>
- To: Pavel Machek <pavel ucw cz>
- Cc: Jesper Juhl <jesper juhl gmail com>, Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs ribosome natur cuni cz>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, ext3-users redhat com
- Subject: Re: fs periodic check (was Re: 2.6.22-rc1 killed my ext3 filesystem cleanly unmounted)
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:55:34 -0400
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:39:11PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Right. Could we get more helpful message here? 'Filesystem check on
> next boot on AC power'?
So "(check deferred; on battery)" wasn't explicit enough? I guess I
assumed that users would understand that the opposite of "on battery"
was "on AC power". I guess I could say "(check defferred 'til on AC
power)" if people think it would be clearer.
> Or maybe keep counting, and when we reach 2x mount-count-limit,
> force a fsck, battery power or not?
We do that already. It's just tough to make that all fit on an 80
status message. :-)
- Ted
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]