Re: forced fsck (again?)

[Bryan Kadzban <bryan kadzban is-a-geek net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Damian Menscher wrote:
> I also have a newbie question: does the fsck of a snapshot really
> catch everything that might be wrong with the drive, or are there
> other failure modes that only a real fsck would catch?

AFAIK, it catches everything.  The LVM2 snapshot is effectively a copy
of the FS at the time the snapshot was taken.

Of course, that could be wrong, but I don't believe so...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHmIKNS5vET1Wea5wRA+dRAJwJUjV4A3O1WjvmOj7EDZgZZJg/hwCeKgt1
yUIA6B+esLW8YFIzyzMWQeY=
=T1+Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----