[fab] project hosting?

[Colin Bodell]

Why should it be avoided? SourceForge.net is not open source yet 
delivers a tremendous service to the community.
We should focus on capability and community value. You get a no cost, 
turnkey, hosted system with  admin, backup network that you
can configure the meet the needs of the Fedora community etc. That's not 
a bad deal in my book. Compare SourceForge Enterprise
against, say, Savannah (except there is not much of a comparison). I'd 
be happy to admin it for the community too :-)

Col

seth vidal wrote:

>On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 12:04 -0700, Colin Bodell wrote:
>  
>
>>SourceForge Enterprise Edition is (today) proprietary.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>and should, therefore, be avoided.
>
>In the same way we ducked bitkeeper when we were originally looking at
>SCMs
>
>
>-sv
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>fedora-advisory-board mailing list
>fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
>  
>