Re: [fab] The next board once this board is tired of being the board

[Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>]

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:41 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:30:57AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 00:17 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > >    2. Placement of community seats:
> > >        a. Do we have elections or is it all placed?
> > >           i. If elections how often to have elections (proposed: every 2
> > > releases)
> > 
> > I thought the suggestion was to stagger things -- essentially, have an
> > election every release but only turn over half of the community seats.
> > This will help to ensure continuity and "memory"
> 
> I (and others) have been pushing for that in the current FESCo discussions.
> But, I don't think the seats _have_ to be turned over.  It is an election, so
> if the same people get elected again that's fine too.  It's more about the
> length of a term and making sure the stagger is setup so that at most half the
> seats can be turned at one time.

Right, my wording was imprecise.  The seats don't have to be turned
over, just up for re-election

Jeremy