Re: [fab] Fedora Logo Proposal

[Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk redhat com>]

On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> I think everyone would probably agree that any Creative Commons "NC" is
> not free enough (probably "ND" as well), but what about "BY" and/or
> "SA"?  Are there other licenses that work well for art?

Because the logo is a registered trademark, there are *no* open licenses 
that can apply to it.  By definition.

Any usage of the Fedora logo must be "explicitly approved" by us.  Now, 
that "explicit approval" process can be as lightweight as we can 
*possibly* make it -- but *by definition* our cannot be placed into any 
kind of commons.

The painful truth.

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------