Re: [fab] JBJ considered harmfull

[seth vidal <skvidal linux duke edu>]

On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 22:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 21:35 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:10 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > > 
> > > We will continue to deal with these unpleasant issues until we have the 
> > > courage to resolve them.
> > 
> > Hate to revive this, but it's getting press now.  LWN has a subscribers
> > only link here:
> > 
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/196523/
> > 
> > IMHO, a public announcement about the direction Fedora is going to go in
> > regards to RPM should be made soon.
> > 
> 
> <sigh> so much fun.
> 
> There's a meeting taking place either this or next week about internal
> issues at rh about rpm.
> 
> We talked about it briefly at the last board meeting.
> 
> lwn will bring a lot of heat and light, not much energy, sadly.
> 
> I wonder who suggested this article topic to corbet?
> 


my response to the whole article:

http://lwn.net/Articles/196593/