[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [fab] Re: openmotif
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer jdub homelinux org>
- To: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: [fab] Re: openmotif
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:03:25 -0500
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 12:41, Rahul wrote:
> > Yes.
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00081.htm
> >l
>
> This mail has absolutely no info regarding why a package would be acceptable
> for Extras when it isn't acceptable for Core. This disturbs me greatly. If
> the license isn't good enough for core, it shouldn't be in Extras either.
+1
Extras is not a dumping ground for packages that aren't suitable for
Core. If someone wants to push a package from Core -> Extras, it still
goes through a review. Openmotif will fail that review immediately,
given that it's license is not OSI compatible.
josh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]