[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [fab] Re: openmotif
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer jdub homelinux org>
- To: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: [fab] Re: openmotif
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:49:46 -0500
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 18:09 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> >
> > But what is the POINT? We aren't going to be touching openmotif at all, only
> > dropping it, so moving it to Extras makes NO SENSE. Moving the things that
> > depend on it over so that they can be made to work with lesstif makes some
> > sense, for those things that we no longer need in core, but moving openmotif
> > just to move it is silly. If we're going to touch openmotif, we're going to
> > remove it. period. There is ZERO gain to importing it into Extras. ZERO.
> >
>
> I am repeating myself here but the point is that we never had libraries
> in Fedora Core without applications dependent on them and since we are
> moving the dependencies I dont see any reason for openmotif to be a
> exception and stay in Fedora Core. Again the alternative is to drop
> openmotif and all its dependencies in both Fedora Core and Fedora Extras
> immediately and fix applications to work with lesstif and import them
> back again. Think of it and make a decision either way.
Nobody is asking for openmotif to stay in Core. It needs to be dropped,
I think everyone agrees on that so far. But it needs to be dropped
completely and not moved to Extras.
As for the applications that depend on motif, I say we do the following:
1) Announce that openmotif will be dropped in X days, weeks.
2) Provide information o lesstif as the alternative.
3) Maintainers of packages that have motif dependencies have the same X
days, or weeks to fix their applications to work with lesstif
4) Drop openmotif after the time period has elapsed
5) Deal with any unfixed packages at that time.
josh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]