[fab] FSF Requirements for srpm provisions
Michael Schwendt
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Fri Nov 3 08:42:27 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:23:53 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 15:50, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > As long as the SRPMs remain available. If the respin involves packages
> > where we don't keep the RPMS/SRPMS for the life of the ISO respin then
> > we'd be in trouble.
> >
> > I know this would cause trouble for things from FC-devel. I think it
> > would be a problem for FC-updates and FE as well.
> >
>
> Don't forget CVS. It's just as valid as a source provider as the SRPMS.
What is the life-time of the binary files in the Fedora Extras lookaside
cache?
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list