Re: [fab] FSF Requirements for srpm provisions

[Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>]

On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:23:53 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:

> On Thursday 02 November 2006 15:50, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > As long as the SRPMs remain available.  If the respin involves packages
> > where we don't keep the RPMS/SRPMS for the life of the ISO respin then
> > we'd be in trouble.
> >
> > I know this would cause trouble for things from FC-devel.  I think it
> > would be a problem for FC-updates and FE as well.
> >
> 
> Don't forget CVS.  It's just as valid as a source provider as the SRPMS.

What is the life-time of the binary files in the Fedora Extras lookaside
cache?