[fab] looking at our surrent state a bit
Thorsten Leemhuis
fedora at leemhuis.info
Fri Nov 3 16:22:32 UTC 2006
Seems we talked at cross purposes a bit.
Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 10:47, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> I'm not saying we need FF 2 as a official update now. Get it out in one
>> or two months when most extensions are fixed. Or put it in a special
>> repo (as aiglx in FC5) and maintain it there for those interested.
> So first you're complaining that FF2 wasn't made available for FC6,
> and now you're saying it shouldn't be,
I said it doesn't match "Fedora is about the rapid progress of Free and
Open Source software and content." if Ubtuntu can ship with it two days
later.
Further: I think it is okay that it was not shipped. But we should
explain the reasons to our users and give them a outlook like "We'll
probably ship it as a update"
> only when its ready, and that it should be
> made available in a special repo for those to test.
Yes.
> I seem to remember Chris Aillon posting up FF2 rpms for FC6 systems
They are tagged with "fc7". Most users will fear that.
> a while
> ago, and got all of some 50~ downloaders. He still feels its not ready for
> FC6, but it is in rawhide. How is this NOT what you wanted to see?
I would like to see FF at a place like
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/projects/
(not "only" on people") and with a repo file that people can easily
install.
CU
thl
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list