[fab] State of Fedora (a long email)

[Paul W. Frields]

On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 17:18 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Karsten Wade schrieb:
> > However, there are people who like that [stuff] in their subject, 
> > [...]
> > As for Reply-to munging.  Well, it's evil stuff, but there are equally
> > smart people on both sides of that debate. [...]
> 
> Well, to be fair, I don't like to see [stuff] in the subjects and I
> don't like Reply-to munging. But I could live with them; the different
> settings on different fedora lists are those that make everything really
> confusing...

I can live with the latter better than the former, but mostly just +1 on
the last sentence.  The current hodgepodge approach is ludicrous.

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20061112/6bc6813c/attachment.sig>