[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.
- From: "Mike McGrath" <mmcgrath fedoraproject org>
- To: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:02:49 -0600
On 11/16/06, Christopher Blizzard <blizzard redhat com> wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
> That can't account for people getting things directly from mirrors. And
> if a certain large PowerPC company has an internal tier 1 mirror of
> Fedora you won't get any hits from there for PPC. Remember, 90% of all
> statistics are lies ;)
Yet another reason to bring up measuring our installed base, as opposed
to download numbers. We're arguing here without a lot of data and it shows.
--Chris
These aren't download numbers, these are unique IP's that have
contacted the mirrors.fp.o site looking for updates-released-fc6. Not
saying they're exact. But it will catch users using default yum
configs. We should restart the metrics conversation soon. There's a
lot of smart people on the list, hopefully we can figure out something
clever without being too invasive.
-Mike
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]