[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- To: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:21:30 +0800
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:48 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating redhat com) said:
> > Sure, but how can you tell? How can you tell what somebody might have done to
> > get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up in an iso?
>
> So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build
> it? Why would someone go to that much effort?
One example that comes immediately to mind is cross-compilation.
It's very tempting to cross-compile to support CPUs like ARM --- and fro
long bitter experience we _know_ that cross-compilation causes all kinds
of interesting screwups -- largely due to the {mis,}use of autotools
IIRC.
I'm don't think we'd ever want a cross-built distro to be 'blessed'.
Scratchbox is better but still I'm not sure.
--
dwmw2
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]