Re: [fab] Architecture Policy.

[seth vidal <skvidal linux duke edu>]

On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 16:31 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 11:18 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Have you *READ* the proposal? 
> 
> Of course I've read the proposal. Have _you_ actually tried dealing with
> Extras package-monkeys recently; trying to get them to fix a problem in
> their packages which is even slightly outside their own use case?

I have a suggestion, David. Stop referring to our active and appreciated
volunteers as package monkeys. If you cannot refer to them respectfully
in public then do not do it at all.

-sv