FESCo future
Greg Dekoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Mon Nov 27 17:29:23 UTC 2006
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Stuff like this becomes less of a worry if we focus on SIG's for
> various software packages/groups instead of a large all encompassing
> body. Groups like KDE, Gnome, java, PHP, etc could get their own
> SIG's and own repos. I'm not saying we should do this, but I do think
> we should look at doing it.
Yeah, I think there's a lot of merit in this approach.
The job of F-star should be to make sure that packages in Fedora are built
properly, work together, and are properly maintained. This includes
"release management" of F-star in its entirety, IMHO.
The management of various "distros" that are derived from F-star should be
individual Projects or SIGs. Fedora Desktop would be a Project. Fedora
Games would be a SIG. Sounds good to me.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the fedora-advisory-board
mailing list