mailing-list reorganisation, round 3 on this list

[Bill Nottingham]

Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net) said: 
> But Thorsten has a point: All packagers need to know what happens over
> there - same is true for some other lists, too.
> 
> So I suggest to have a developer/packager "announce" list, where
> various boards, sigs and so on can *tersly* communicate *results*,
> e.g.  important board/fesco decisions, packaging guidelines changes,
> infrastructure/buildsystem changes etc., but keep the discussions in
> separate lists as happens now. fedora-devel-news?
> 
> But before continuing on thinking about mailing lists structure,
> perhaps one should wait to see what the upcoming organisational
> structures will look like to start mapping them to lists, or to deduce
> some list structure out of it. I guess the most important and
> communicative organs do need to keep dedicated lists for a good SNR.

Makes sense to me.

Bill