On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 16:02 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> Max Spevack schrieb:
> > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Karsten Wade wrote:
> >
> >> [2]
> >> FPB
> >> \=> FESCo --------------
> >> | |=> QA +
> >> | |=> Testing +
> >> | |=> RelEng +
> >> | +
> >> |=> Docs --------------+
> >> |=> Artwork -----------+
> >> |=> Ambassadors -------+
> >> |=> L10n --------------+
> >> \=> ... ---------------+
> >
> > I think I prefer this second model. It allows FESCO to work on *exactly*
> > what is core to the next release of the Fedora OS, and it allows some of
> > the other Fedora projects to help FESCO as needed (Docs or artwork are
> > great examples here) but maintain their own sort of lifecycle that isn't
> > necessarily tied to a specific release of Fedora.
>
> +1
+1
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part