[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: LWN headline: Blame Fedora = High Praise
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge gmail com>
- Cc: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: LWN headline: Blame Fedora = High Praise
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:36:32 -0300
On May 1, 2007, "Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge gmail com> wrote:
> First doing this breaks the "Work with Upstream" on this.
> I would say that the first step would be for Alexandre Oliva and
> similar minded people to create a SIG and then build a working
> kernel+tools around Fedora 7 final to get a working design done.
It looks like there's a lot of confusion as to what I'm talking about.
For the nth time, I'm not talking about removing the non-Free firmware
that's "hidden" in the kernel. Not doing so is a stand-still that
might be acceptable.
I'm talking about *not* adding *more* non-Free firmware as separate
packages. Adding them is a step away from freedom, the stated goal of
the project.
That said, yes, cleaning the Fedora kernel from non-Free firmware
sounds like an interesting project I should probably get my hands on.
But don't let this other topic get you confused as to the point I'm
trying to bring up here. It's just a distraction.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]