Re: FS/OSS license: not quite enough of a requirement

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 19:41 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> Perhaps it would make sense to also add a note explaining that Fedora
> is committed to not distributing [non-firmware] software in such a way
> that the software wouldn't abide by these definitions, from the point
> of view of the recipients.  E.g. software licensed under a Free
> Software license but without corresponding sources.  If the reader
> finds deviations s/he should report them.

Or perhaps, more simply, that all software [non-firmware] in Fedora must
include source code.

~spot