Re: FS/OSS license: not quite enough of a requirement

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:33 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> Another possibility is that of restrictive patent licenses, and the
> recent creative patent agreements we recently learned about, such as
> that between Microsoft and Novell.

Restrictive patent licenses don't qualify for Fedora as is.


> Yet another possibility would be trademark agreements that effectively
> limited Fedora users' freedoms.

Trademark or patent agreements are a board issue, but I can't see the
board agreeing to those sorts of things.

~spot