Alexandre Oliva wrote:
And today I realized that's not quite enough to ensure that the *user* receives the source code from us. All that states is that *we* get the source code. So we could in theory accept Free Software, including source code, under a liberal license, build it AFAICT in perfect accordance with our guidelines, and distribute only its binaries to our users.
huh? , it's right in the *definition* of opensource (see item 2): http://opensource.org/docs/osdNow, If it would make you feel better that we spell it out *explicitly*, then draft a proposal for review:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee#head-bc786fd8400956418c30ac87c30733f0c008b146 -- Rex -- Rex