Will Fedora 10 Contain KDE 3.5.10 or Not?

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:28 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Right now the best thing we can do is spread the meme:
> >
> > http://iquaid.org/2008/08/11/fedora-is-about-to-break-what-is-most-important-to-you/
> >
> > Nice headline, what? ;-D
> 
> The next easiest thing we can do... is make sure that we can actually
> take the alpha image..download it..and then run it via our included
> virtualization gui on an selinux enabled machine!
> 
> If I have to use audit2allow to take my Fedora Alpha image in my
> Download directory and run it under virt-manager gui... that's a fail.

Yeah, I ran across that last week, wasn't sure where the problem was
exactly so haven't filed a bug report.

> Sure qemu -cdrom whatever.iso works...but isn't the point of the gui
> to actually be...usable?
> 
> -jef"really wish setroubleshoot would let me build per alert policy
> via a set of clicks so I didn't have to drop to the cmdline and mess
> with audit2allow as a user"spaleta
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-advisory-board mailing list
> fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
-- 
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/attachments/20080811/ddaa9391/attachment.sig>