[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: dormant bugs and our perception
- From: Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk redhat com>
- To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base <fedora-marketing-list redhat com>, fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: dormant bugs and our perception
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:23:03 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Jon Stanley wrote:
I was triaging old bugs in the FC6 kernel, and got this back form a
reporter. While I agree that a lack of response can be frustrating
to a reporter, I'm not entirely sure what (if anything) we can do
about it.- I'm sending this to marketing-list since it seems to be a
problem for us rather than QA - though probably both, and I'm sure
alot of us are on both.
Handling this exact kind of problem is why bug triagers are worth their
weight in gold.
Because here's the thing: people don't expect all of their bugs to be
magically fixed. (Well, some do, but it doesn't make good business sense
or good community sense to cater to unreasonable people.)
What they *do* expect is for someone to say, "gee, thanks for posting this
bug, we'll set the priority accordingly and maybe poke a developer." And
we fail pretty miserably at that.
Cross-posting to the Fedora advisory board list. Our inability to create
and nurture a bug triage community continues to be painful, and our
current QA resources within Red Hat continue to be (necessarily)
technically focused rather than community focused. This is a problem we
need to solve.
--g
--
Greg DeKoenigsberg
Community Development Manager
Red Hat, Inc. :: 1-919-754-4255
"To whomsoever much hath been given...
...from him much shall be asked"
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]