[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)
- From: Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <foss mailinglists gmail com>
- To: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:41:33 +0530
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Aillon wrote:
The problem
> is that sharing with Red Hat makes the Fedora part of it worse. Like
> when you have to scroll down past all the myriad of Red Hat stuff just
> to be able to file a bug against Fedora. Or when Fedora bugs get duped
> to bugs that are marked private, or set as Blocker/Dependent on the bug.
> Or when bugs get filed against Fedora, moved to RHEL, and then marked
> WONTFIX in RHEL, or get fixed in RHEL but not in Fedora or whatnot.
Isn't this more of a reason to fix how RHT does things and less of a
reason to fork out ? All the above are valid reasons, and having
experienced them in various quanta I do agree with them
~sankarshan
- --
http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHfRdFXQZpNTcrCzMRAksxAKCj9CC0mZYCVaaBLG6HofU3k+JZ8wCgpIcD
Y4sSu7pS8WkdkRfM8R8Roug=
=anhZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]