Re: Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)

["Stephen John Smoogen" <smooge gmail com>]

On Jan 3, 2008 4:08 PM, Christopher Aillon <caillon redhat com> wrote:
> On 01/03/2008 10:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Now I don't know what the timeline for Bugzilla 3.0 or if that one
> > will have the pump and flow mechanism of being able to link bugs from
> > one bugzilla instance to another (gnome to fedora, fedora to gnome,
> > etc etc) so that duplicates can be handled better...
>
> But it's dependent on when Red Hat gets their changes forward ported.
> Whereas Fedora could already be using Bugzilla 3.0 if it made things
> much better to use (which it does based on the numerous improvements
> seen on bugzilla.mozilla.org).  And MOVED bugs has always been
> supported, AFAIK.  It just needs to be set up by both the sending and
> receiving bugzilla admins.
> http://wiki.mozilla.org/Bugzilla:How_to_setup_the_Bug_Moving_feature
>

Duh.. one should not open their mouth when one hasnt looked at the
code for a long time.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"