[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: fedora-advisory-board redhat com
- Subject: Re: Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:11:04 -0500
John Poelstra (poelstra redhat com) said:
> Okay, maybe that is too "corporate speak" :)
>
> Up until now the rationale I've seen has mostly been "we should do this
> because Fedora should do all of its own stuff" or "if we had a separate
> instance everything would be better". So far I haven't found any of these
> arguments to be compelling enough in the face of the disruption it would
> cause to Fedora and Red Hat.
>
> Would we be creating more new problems than we are solving?
Benefits:
- ease of incorporating new upstream versions
- with those versions, easier to move bugs and link them to other
upstream bug trackers
- able to wipe out old bugs
- removal of various non-upstream 'features' that RH uses that Fedora
doesn't need
Demerits:
- RH developers no longer have one-stop shopping
- would need RH changes to support moving bugs to RH bugzilla
- would need to run our own instance
- would wipe out old bugs
That's my 10-second view.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]