Re: Fedora Bugzilla Instance (was dormant bugs and our perception)

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

seth vidal (skvidal fedoraproject org) said: 
> 
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 14:31 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> 
> > I agree that it would be hard to get this without splitting, and that
> > Bugzilla is cluttered enough as-is, but given the other benefits of
> > staying upstream, I'd suggest that greasemonkey or a server-side
> > 'fedora view' which hide these extra features are better ways to solve
> > this.
> 
> It might be worthwhile to split if we could ensure one feature worked
> from rh-bz to fedora bz: report migration. It'd be great if fedora bz
> could have an 'add this to rh bz'. That would make interaction easier
> and, hopefully, make the transition easier for rh employees.
> 
> it should be do-able, I think.

I don't see why this would require a split, though.

Bill