Re: [Fwd: Re: Eeedora (Fedora + Eee PC) - hosting question?]

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet gmail com>]

On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:47 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:38 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:34:00 -0500
> > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet gmail com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Blech. Google (no pun intended) first, ask later.
> > > 
> > > http://code.google.com/p/eeedora/
> > > 
> > > Short answer: Ethernet and WLAN modules, and XFCE.
> > 
> > This is where we really really really need a more relaxed trademark
> > policy, so that we can put out something like this for the Eee under
> > the Fedora name, with Fedora branding, etc..
> 
> Alternately, why aren't those kernel modules in Fedora? If they were
> using all Fedora packages, then they _could_ use the Fedora name.

csnook is working on getting atl2/atlx upstream, and ath5k is  being
hammered on by someone as we speak, I'm sure.

http://people.redhat.com/csnook/atl2/

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet gmail com>