Rahul Sundaram escreveu: > On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Hi >> >> Since FESCo is going through a process of democratization now, would it >> be a good idea for FAMSCo to follow on its footsteps? The current >> steering committee was sort of elected through a informal voting process >> in a IRC channel but that doesnt scale. >> >> The current steering committee >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/SteeringCommittee >> >> If you havent followed what Fedora Extras has been doing, >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SteeringCommittee/Nominations >> >> There isnt a structure in place for Fedora Extras packagers to do the >> actual voting yet but we can probably reuse whatever they come up with. >> Replace cvsextras group with ambassadors group in the accounts system >> and we should be ok. > > Does anyone have anything to say about this? Everyone happy with the > status quo? > > Rahul > > -- > Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list > Fedora-ambassadors-list redhat com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list > What's the objective to recreate our FAMSCo group? -- Rodrigo de Oliveira Menezes Embaixador do Projeto Fedora http://www.projetofedora.org http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/RodrigoMenezes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature