[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Pathname-based buildreqs not working?
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists karan org>
- To: Discussion of Fedora build system <fedora-buildsys-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Pathname-based buildreqs not working?
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:26:10 +0000
Michael E Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:08:02AM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Yesterday I noticed that mock/yum seem to be having trouble finding
>> pathname-based buildreqs.
>>
>> For example, buildreqs of /usr/include/tcpd.h and /usr/include/pcap.h
>> aren't getting found. I use these to maintain spec compatibility across
>> various releases, where these files can be found in either tcp_wrappers
>> or tcp_wrappers-devel, or libpcap or libpcap-devel packages
>> respectively.
>>
>> I've tried upgrading to mock 0.8.15 from CVS (F-8 branch) and it hasn't
>> helped.
>>
>> Is this intentional behaviour (not getting/reading the filelists
>> metadata) for speed purposes?
>
> Paul,
> This should be fixed in latest mock git repo. This is an important
> fix and I'll be releasing it later this week (0.8.17/0.9.1). Thanks for
> reporting this and for your responsiveness in debugging it. Thanks also
> to the yum folks who helped debug as well.
Just to be complete here, this fix isnt going to fix it on rhel5 /
centos5, is it ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 icq
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]