Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services

[Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>]

On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 05:35 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> Would an add/remove rather than textbox for additional services make better
> sense? In which case should we have a predefined list of more well known
> services, with addition of custom ports (possibly with descriptive text or
> just showing both port and service name from /etc/services).

That's sort of the direction the anaconda screen has moved in.  I
haven't quite gone to the point of adding arbitrary ones, but it's not
difficult to do.

> I wonder if we will want to have better "service definition" for 
> service publishing via howl.

Eventually, yes.

Jeremy