[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: replacing XMMS



On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:48, Colin Walters wrote:

> What I'm curious of is comments by people who still use XMMS, and why. 
> What are the most important things to you that need to be fixed in
> Rhythmbox?

I still use XMMS, since it's less CPU intensive than Rhythmbox.  On an
older machine Rhythmbox, tends to use too much resources.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple ameritech net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]