[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: replacing XMMS



On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 14:18, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:48, Colin Walters wrote:
> 
> > What I'm curious of is comments by people who still use XMMS, and why. 
> > What are the most important things to you that need to be fixed in
> > Rhythmbox?
> 
> I still use XMMS, since it's less CPU intensive than Rhythmbox.  On an
> older machine Rhythmbox, tends to use too much resources.

True.  There's a few senses of "removal" - removal from the package set
entirely, and just removal from the default installation, and removal
from the default menu.  I'm really only talking about the latter.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]