[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: replacing XMMS
- From: Matias Feliciano <feliciano matias free fr>
- To: byte bytebot net, Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop <fedora-desktop-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: replacing XMMS
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:05:21 +0200
Le jeu 22/04/2004 à 05:02, Colin Charles a écrit :
> On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 05:11, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > True. There's a few senses of "removal" - removal from the package set
> > > entirely, and just removal from the default installation, and removal
> > > from the default menu. I'm really only talking about the latter.
> >
> > Removal from the default menu is wrong.
>
> Or we can bring back the Extras menu
No.
I don't want the extra step "Extras menu".
If i want xmms in the menu :
$ rpm -i|yum install|system-config-package|... xmms
If i don't want xmms :
$ rpm -e xmms
Why should we have entries in the menu if we don't use them ?
Why add an extra step for an application that the user use ?
Set the best default and then let users to add their preferred
applications and remove some default applications if they don't use
them.
> (or under Sound & Video -> More
> Sound & Video Applications), and give it its actual name - we'll call it
> XMMS
>
> > If it's installed, it should be in the menu. For example, if it
> > moved to extras, it would still have a menu item, obviously. So,
> > if it's still in Core, it should still have a menu item, just not
> > necessarily be in the default package set.
>
> Yes, if installed, a menu item should exist
+1000
> --
> Colin Charles, byte aeon com my
> http://www.bytebot.net/
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]