[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Desktop issues discussion proposal
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop <fedora-desktop-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Desktop issues discussion proposal
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:58:21 -0400
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 13:29, seth vidal wrote:
> > If you have individual and group installation and removal (plus handling
> > multiple repository which I believe yum already does ... I am not currently a
> > yum user), this could give the needed functionality as well as replace
> > up2date.
>
> up2date isn't going away - it's interfaces to rhn and the protocols
> involved are it's best feature - in addition, adrian has generated a
> rather impressive infrastructure in up2date.
>
> But I would like to see a nice gui on yum and some neat utils derived
> from there.
To me a separate GUI based on the backends used is pretty darn weird. I
don't see how it's sane to install both a yum gui and an up2date gui by
default for example.
Havoc
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]