On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 02:33, Ray Strode wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 21:27 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote:
> > So, as this thread illustrates, there are plenty of opinions on the
> > screensavers.
> >
> > Perhaps someone with the authority/ability can make a call on this based
> > on the various options floated on this thread and go ahead with it.
> So what I'm going to end up doing is making the base xscreensaver
> package have a small number of screensavers, and then have an additional
> package for the more fancy ones.
Have you already decided how to tackle the "how can xscreensaver hacks
packages be dropped in simply" problem I outlined in one of my last
posts?
I've already messed around with adding hacks to
/usr/X11R6/lib/app-defaults/XScreensaver (in the course of packaging
rss-glx for Fedora) and this is neither fun and nor reliable ;-) -- you
need to deal with any of {xscreensaver base package,random xscreensaver
extra hacks package} being {installed,removed,updated}. I'd vote very
much for some /etc/xscreensaver/hacks.d directory where extra hacks
pacvkages can simply drop their configuration.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp redhat com
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part