On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:33:28 +0100 Caolan McNamara <caolanm redhat com> wrote: > Sure, if the non-translated bits are fundamentally overscale to fit on > cd vs the other options, or its too slow to run from CD, or we hate it > too much to want it, then that's fine. But if the reason boiled down > to solely having all languages supported on the cd as a goal and apps > are then picked that have less translation coverage due to space > reasons then that strikes me as a bit of a fudge. I don't disagree. However it's a lot easier to say "we don't support your language because there was no translation for it upstream" than to say "we don't support your language because we didn't think it was important enough to include on the media. Sorry.". Still, some thought could be put around having regional editions of the live image that include a set of the languages for that region or some other ideas such as that. It just takes somebody playing around with it (: The good news is that the tools are relatively easy so that those playing at home can try things out instead of waiting for something to fall out of the Red Hat black box. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature