[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: metacity compositor in rawhide
- From: Ray Strode <rstrode redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop <fedora-desktop-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: metacity compositor in rawhide
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:47:22 -0500
Hi,
> >> For turning on compositing, perhaps that should be in the "desktop
> >> effects" dialog that Fedora has now?
> > Why would we ever want the user to be in an environment where
> > compositing isn't available? I mean, why do we want an off button?
> > If COMPOSITE is found, I think metacity should leverage it (at least
> > do automatic compositing at a minimum).
> >
> > Even for remote X it probably makes sense to have
> > compositing on I think (less redraws).
> Basically I think the config option means "test out beta window
> manager and X server" - at the point that we think the stuff really
> works and is not just a beta, the config option is silly.
I guess that's kind of what "Desktop Effects" is for compiz.
> There might still be options for whether to have drop shadows,
> transparency, etc., I don't know, but we wouldn't have an option for
> whether to use the COMPOSITE extension.
I'd kind of envision Desktop Effects on -> compiz, Desktop Effects off
-> metacity with automatic compositing (or a minimum, non-customizable
set of compositing operations that the user wouldn't consider
"effects")
I don't think it ever makes sense to have two compositing managers
available in the UI each with overlapping / different toggleable
effects.
Or were you suggesting make Desktop Effects on -> metacity with iain's
cm, and Desktop Effects off -> metacity with no cm (and compiz just
taken out of the picture) ?
--Ray
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]