On Monday 15 January 2007 14:20, Adam Jackson wrote: > I'm a bit confused by some of this, in the sense that the tools seem to > be a bit overzealous in pulling in deps. > > For example, I don't see libdmx explicitly listed anywhere, and on a FC6 > machine, 'rpm -q --whatrequires libdmx' and 'repoquery --whatrequires > libdmx' both only return libdmx-devel. But I also don't see > libdmx-devel listed anywhere. > > So I'm not sure why it's in the big list. See Bill and Jeremy's email, but in this case, many things (gdm included) require something that libdmx provides: libdmx-0:1.0.2-3.1.x86_64 gdm-1:2.16.4-1.fc6.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xdmx-0:1.1.1-47.4.fc6.x86_64 xorg-x11-utils-0:7.1-2.fc6.x86_64 libdmx-devel-0:1.0.2-3.1.x86_64 -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpGZifvPu5Ie.pgp
Description: PGP signature