On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:18 -0500, inode0 wrote: > > Is Fedora committed to the FHS? Or is Red Hat still committed to it? > > The purpose was for root only programs of a certain class to be > located in /sbin for example but including non-root programs there > does muddy the experience for the end user. However I do think it is > cleaner to make those programs available to a user by means other than > adding /sbin to the default path of a normal user. A few links are > cheap. Would links for those in /usr/bin clash with the FHS? I think the idea is to place symlinks in (/usr)/sbin as par of a fhs-compat package. Otherwise the bins actually go in (/usr)/bin. "root only" is extremely muddy these days, especially because as non-root I'd like to explore syntax options and usage statements before I invoke the command with sudo. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part