Re: i686 (and likely x86_64) Live image not fitting on CD

["Colin Walters" <walters verbum org>]

2008/9/23 Adam Jackson <ajax redhat com>:
>
> Not that it's much by way of disk size, but it looks like a lot of the X
> libs got measurably bigger for no particularly good reason.  libXrandr,
> for example, got almost 40% bigger purely because the ChangeLog in
> %doc got three times bigger.
>
> Do we care that much about including these?  I can't see that they're
> worth much even on a real system.

Agree.  One possibility if there is resistance to simply dropping them
is to move them into the -devel packages.